Band Festivals and Repertoire
by William L. Berz
Reprinted with permission from Tempo, the official magazine of the New Jersey Music Educators Association.
Citation information: Berz, William, "Band Festivals and Repertoire," Tempo, 60(3), (March 2006), 46-47.


    In the late fall and early winter of each year, I receive a number of phone calls and emails from high school directors asking for advice about selecting music for performance at concert band festivals. I am very flattered that people ask my opinion, and I try to provide information as best as I can. Choosing music is a very difficult yet important challenge. This last round of phone calls along with a recent article from the WASBE Journal has encouraged me to again consider the concert band festival especially in regards to selection of repertoire.
    I have written several articles for Tempo over the years on the subject of concert band festivals (see reference list). The article from October 2003 centered on the practical aspects of choosing music. A number of key elements were outlined. (See article for full discussion of each point.)
1.    Play music that fits the technical abilities of the ensemble.
2.    Play literature that features the ensemble’s strengths instead of weaknesses.
3.    Observe festival time limits and especially do not over program.
4.    Avoid popular music.
5.    Avoid the most oft-performed repertoire (such as Irish Tune and the Holst Suites).
6.    Avoid marches in 6/8 time.
7.    Avoid concerti or solo pieces.
8.    Consider the unfamiliar gem.

    Choice of music is challenging no matter the performance situation. It is the music that determines much of what is going to happen in the classroom. It is the curriculum centering all of the classroom actions.
    The same general educational goals must be considered when choosing music for festivals as for other performance settings. Since such a considerable amount of time and energy is spent preparing for festival, the selection of educational music is doubly important. The kinds of practical elements listed above should be considered in addition to musical and educational elements.
    Teachers obviously want their students to be successful at festival; this is not contrary to any kind of educational objective. Certainly, the music chosen should have the best potential for the students to be successful. However success should not be defined as “winning” or achieving a high rating that is an empty gain.
    Unfortunately, the competitive aspects of the festival/contest experience seem to out weigh the music education aspects for many—if not most—directors. And this is certainly understandable. Who wants to come in second place? Directors need to keep educational goals central to festival and contest participation.
    Directors often select music almost entirely based on criteria dictated on achieving success at festivals. Does the work hide intonation problems? Are solos avoided that feature certain instruments like oboe and bassoon? Is the work so new that judges most certainly will be unfamiliar with it? However, the larger picture must be considered. Band festivals should be about music education, not sportsmanship.

Another Approach?
In 2005, Stephen Budiansky wrote a short opinion article that was published in the Washington Post. (That, and a subsequent article, is available (see reference list). Readers are strongly encouraged to examine them. These articles have generated considerable debate in the band community. Budiansky’s central concern was the aesthetically poor quality of music heard at school band concerts He noted that much of the music was composed by “educational band composers” written expressly for the purposes of school bands. Budiansky questioned the educational benefit of studying this kind of music.
    In a more recent article to be published in the WASBE Journal, Budiansky and co-author Timothy W. Foley (former leader of the Marine Band) continue this line of thinking and identify a number of reasons why band directors select “educational music” to perform.
    Far too much emphasis is placed on school band as a performance activity—and at times even a competitive activity, almost like an athletic event—rather than a curricular course with solid educational objectives. No one would take seriously an English course that aimed to boost test scores by using easy-to-read works written by educators, at the expense of an introduction to the greatest writers of the English language, from Chaucer to Shakespeare to Eliot to Faulkner. No one would take seriously a high school science program whose sole purpose was to compete in science fairs and win prizes (and to stage fund raisers to pay for trips to science fairs). No one would judge the success of a social science program based solely on how many geography-bee prizes the students won. Yet such is all too often the uncritically accepted norm in the band programs of our high schools.
    It may take nothing short of a revolution to curtail the current grip that contests, “festivals,” trips, and performances have on the school band world. But nothing would do more for the education of students than to eliminate them all in one fell swoop (Budiansky & Foley, 2005).

Should Band Festivals be Eliminated?
    Should band festivals and contests be eliminated as Budiansky and Foley suggest? It is abundantly clear that too much emphasis placed on contests distorts the educational process. Teachers and students become too centered on the end product rather than on the process of learning.
    As I have written on any number of occasions in Tempo, band festivals do have potential for educational benefit. The dramatic increase in festival participation in New Jersey in recent years has certainly elevated the general performance levels of a considerable number of bands in our state. However, Budiansky and Foley do make a very good point in that band festivals and contests can easily distort any number of elements, especially the selection of repertoire. Directors need to exercise care in choosing music so that educational goals are addressed while still considering the special issues associated with festival participation. Education must remain the central and most important goal.
    Competition is a strong motivator in American society; it is present in almost every facet of life. To ignore the power of motivation would seem to be shortsighted. But however difficult it is to resist, directors must fight the temptation to be overly competitive; it is this factor that creates the difficulties. This is a significant problem with bands—marching, jazz, and concert alike. Directors must find ways to make competition a successful motivator while not permitting the demands to distort or eliminate any educational benefit. Achieving a balance between these sometimes conflicting goals is a distinct challenge.
    The contest movement continues to be one of the most important issues facing our profession. Many rationalize contest participation to motivate students or to justify their programs to parents and administrators. While no one can argue that music teachers must constantly justify the place of music education in the schools, it must be remembered that advocacy is meaningless if educational goals are sacrificed along the way. If music education programs do not provide meaningful experiences for students, then why even have them? Festivals must be used as a means to an end rather than as an end in itself. Music teaching must be centered on teaching MUSIC.
And that brings us back to the word: repertoire.



References
Berz, W. (2003, October). It’s not too early to think about concert band festival. Tempo, 58 (1), 20-22. Available at http://musicweb.rutgers.edu/windband/tempohome1.htm
 
Berz, W. (2000, May). Concert band festivals in New Jersey: A progress report, Tempo, 54 (4), 9. Available at http://musicweb.rutgers.edu/windband/tempohome1.htm

Berz, W. (2000, January) “Ideas on preparing for concert band festival,” Tempo, 54 (2), 45-46. Available at http://musicweb.rutgers.edu/windband/tempohome1.htm

Budiansky, S. (2005a). The kids play great. But that music…. Washington Post (January 30), B3. Available at http://www.budiansky.com/music.html

Budiansky, S. (2005b). The school music controversy. http://www.budiansky.com/music.html

Budiansky, S. & Foley, T. W. (2005). The quality of repertoire in school music programs: Literature review, analysis, and discussion. WASBE Journal, 12, in press.